Business profile & competitive position
Autodesk, Inc. sits in the Technology sector, specifically the Software – Application industry. According to its most recent 10-K filing, the company is a global leader in 3D design, engineering, and entertainment technology, serving architecture, engineering, construction, product design, manufacturing, media, and entertainment. Its software helps customers design, fabricate, manufacture, and build by visualizing, simulating, and analyzing real-world performance early in the design process. Autodesk sells its products worldwide through a combination of direct and indirect channels.
The margin and return figures in the current snapshot support the idea that Autodesk has a durable competitive position. Net margin is 19.5% and return on equity is 49.4%. A net margin near one-fifth of revenue, combined with an ROE approaching 50%, points to strong pricing power and a capital-light, recurring-revenue model. Those numbers are unusually high for industrial exposed software and are consistent with a business whose products are embedded in customer workflows, making switching costly.
Financial posture
Autodesk currently carries a market capitalization of $53.8 billion and trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 36.9. At the current price of $254.73, the stock has an RSI of 62.1 and a 50-day exponential moving average of $233.05. Beta is 1.30, meaning the stock has historically moved more than the broad market for a given change in the S&P 500. That elevated beta is common for high-growth application-software names but also implies sharper drawdowns during risk-off periods.
The valuation multiple of 36.9x earnings is well above the long-run market average, which reflects investor expectations for continued growth and margin stability. The 19.5% net margin and 49.4% ROE show the business is highly profitable, but the P/E leaves little room for execution disappointment. The provided snapshot does not break out total debt, so leverage cannot be assessed from these figures alone.
Strategic priorities & outlook
Autodesk’s latest 10-K lays out several near-term operational priorities that shape how the company expects to grow:
- Develop lifecycle solutions within and across industry clouds, powered by shared platform services and a common data model.
- Invest in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and generative design to deliver automation, insights, efficiency, and more sustainable outcomes for customers.
- Modernize the go-to-market motion through a new transaction model by building direct customer relationships, updating data infrastructure, and retiring older systems and business models.
- Transition multi-year contracts to annual billings and continue shifting the channel mix toward direct and online sales as the business scales.
Operationally, the filing also highlights a deliberate shift away from heavy reliance on distributors. In fiscal 2026, approximately 37% of revenue came from indirect channels, with TD Synnex accounting for 14% of net revenue—down from 33% in fiscal 2025 and 39% in fiscal 2024. No other distributor, reseller, or direct customer exceeded 10% of revenue. Autodesk expects international sales to remain the majority of total net revenue. Most R&D happens in the United States, Canada, and India, while localization is centered principally in Singapore and Ireland. Cloud products are increasingly hosted on Amazon Web Services. As of January 31, 2026, the company employed approximately 14,300 people, down from about 15,300, and completed no business combinations during fiscal 2026.
Macro & geopolitical exposure
Because Autodesk is a global software-application company, its exposures stem from the structure of its industry rather than from any single country-specific event. The most important macro considerations include:
- Currency risk: International sales are expected to remain the majority of revenue, so swings in the U.S. dollar can move reported revenue and earnings even if local-currency demand is stable.
- R&D and talent geography: Performing most R&D in the United States, Canada, and India makes Autodesk sensitive to cross-border immigration, visa, and wage-cost policies affecting technical talent.
- Data and regulatory rules: Localizing products in Singapore and Ireland and hosting cloud workloads on a major U.S. cloud provider exposes the firm to evolving data-sovereignty, privacy, AI-governance, and content-regulation rules around the world.
- Interest-rate and valuation sensitivity: With a beta of 1.30 and a P/E of 36.9, Autodesk carries above-average sensitivity to changes in the discount-rate environment. Rising real rates historically compress valuation multiples for high-duration growth stocks.
- End-market cyclicality: Customers include construction, manufacturing, and media companies, so broader capital-spending and project-approval cycles can influence subscription growth even though software revenue itself is recurring.
Recent developments
Autodesk is heading into its next earnings report on August 27, 2026, after the market close. Wall Street’s consensus earnings-per-share estimate for that report is $3.12, according to the headline published by Zacks on August 24, 2026 titled “Countdown to Autodesk (ADSK) Q2 Earnings: Wall Street Forecasts for Key Metrics.”
In the days leading up to the report, institutional activity has been mixed. On August 22, 2026, defenseworld.net reported that B. Metzler seel. Sohn & Co. AG invested $6.25 million in Autodesk shares. Three days earlier, on August 17, 2026, Zacks published “Autodesk (ADSK) Falls More Steeply Than Broader Market: What Investors Need to Know,” noting the stock had underperformed the broader market. On August 14, 2026, defenseworld.net reported that Baldwin Investment Management LLC lowered its stake in Autodesk. Price action and institutional positioning ahead of a release can be noisy, but the combination of a falling share price, a new institutional buyer, and a reduced stake from another manager underscores the cross-currents heading into the print.
Earnings behavior & post-earnings drift
Autodesk has a flawless recent earnings record: over the last eight reported quarters, the company beat the consensus estimate every time, for a 100% beat rate. The average earnings surprise across those eight quarters was 6.2%, and the average 5-day price move after earnings was 6.9% to the upside. On the surface, the pattern looks like a reliable post-earnings drift story.
However, the last four quarters show that a beat does not always translate into a follow-through rally. On May 28, 2026, Autodesk reported EPS of $2.99 versus an estimate of $2.84, a 5.3% beat, yet the stock fell 4.0% the next day and 3.03% over the following five days. That result is the clearest example of a “beat and fade.”
The prior three releases looked very different. On February 26, 2026, EPS of $2.85 beat the $2.65 estimate by 7.5%, and the stock rose 5.32% the next day and 13.14% over the next five days. On November 25, 2025, EPS of $2.67 beat the $2.50 estimate by 6.8%, producing a 2.36% next-day gain and a 4.35% five-day gain. On August 28, 2025, EPS of $2.62 beat the $2.45 estimate by 6.9%, and the stock jumped 9.09% the next day and 13.13% over the next five days.
Why would a stock fall after beating estimates? In heavily followed application-software names, the market’s real expectation can be higher than the published consensus, or investors may be focused on guidance, billings, net revenue retention, and channel-transition commentary rather than the EPS number alone. Autodesk’s ongoing shift to annual billings, its move toward direct and online sales, and its channel-mix changes all create extra variables that can override a simple beat-versus-miss reaction. The 6.9% average five-day drift is positive, but the individual-path dispersion is wide.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Autodesk’s 100% earnings-beat rate over the last eight quarters mean for the stock?
It means Autodesk has exceeded the published consensus EPS estimate in every one of the last eight reported quarters, with an average surprise of 6.2%. It does not guarantee a positive share-price reaction, because the market may already price in strong results or focus on guidance and other metrics.
Why did Autodesk’s stock fall after beating estimates on May 28, 2026?
Autodesk reported EPS of $2.99 versus a $2.84 estimate, a 5.3% beat, but the stock fell 4.0% the next day and 3.03% over the following five days. That disconnect suggests investors were focused on forward guidance, billings trends, or strategic-transition commentary rather than the headline EPS beat.
What are Autodesk’s main strategic priorities according to its 10-K?
The filing emphasizes lifecycle solutions built on a shared platform and data model, investments in AI and generative design, modernization of the go-to-market motion through a new transaction model, and a shift from multi-year contracts to annual billings. It also notes a continued move toward direct and online sales, with indirect-channel revenue declining from 39% in fiscal 2024 to 37% in fiscal 2026.
For a more complete picture of how sell-side analysts, quantitative models, and institutional holders currently view Autodesk, review the full institutional verdict and consensus breakdown on the ticker’s research page.
| Reported | Actual | Estimate | Surprise | 1D Move | 5D Move |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-28 | $2.99 | $2.84 | +5.3% | -4% | -3.03% |
| 2026-02-26 | $2.85 | $2.65 | +7.5% | +5.32% | +13.14% |
| 2025-11-25 | $2.67 | $2.5 | +6.8% | +2.36% | +4.35% |
| 2025-08-28 | $2.62 | $2.45 | +6.9% | +9.09% | +13.13% |
| 2025-05-22 | $2.29 | $2.15 | +6.5% | - | - |
| 2025-02-27 | $2.29 | $2.14 | +7% | - | - |
Previous ADSK editions
Get the institutional verdict on ADSK
Seven-seat 21-ERT council. Pre-print forecast signed before the earnings release. Post-print grade, published in public. Every verdict sealed with a cryptographic receipt.
Read the ADSK verdict at Gamma QCVerify authenticity
Every Gamma QC verdict is signed with a cryptographic receipt at issuance. Independently verify any published verdict at attest.gammaqc.com. This educational primer is content-only and not itself signed; the institutional verdict at the link above is.